Friday, 18 September 2009
-
Why Healthkicker is UNETHICAL
Healthkicker is a Xanga site that compiles health posts submitted by Xanga users. I used to submit my posts to them when I initially started my blog, but I stopped very quickly because they started to annoy me so much! I didn't want to be associated with them, and also if I submitted all my posts to them, then it'd be like I'm slave working for them for free. There would be no point in subscribing to my site. That may seem selfish, but I do support Xanga. I purchased premium membership so I think that says enough.
I initially disliked Healthkicker because you don't know who is writing for it. The people who write for Healthkicker do not have any credentials. They could be kids! Do you want to listen to a kid when it comes to your health?
Healthkicker is unethical because they confuse the public. I had a conversation with my professor the other day about how unfair it is to the public to be having all these mixed messages given to them. I have bashed Healthkicker before when they published an article about how Slimfast is a good diet.
This is the post that pissed me off. The writer took a piece of correlational research and implied that it was causative. Doesn't make much sense? This is basic research methods that anyone would learn in a first year psychology course.
Correlational research means that there appears to be an ASSOCIATION between two things, but it does NOT mean that one thing causes the other! One needs to be really careful when reading any kind of health information or research. Here's why.
In the particular study from this Healthkicker writer, it was found that a population of people with high levels of alcohol drinking also had high levels of physical activity. This is correlational research because it is only showing an association, but it does NOT mean that drinking alcohol MAKES you more active.
However, this Healthkicker writer misinterpreted the research data and ASSUMED that alcohol will improve your physical performance. She joked how she is going to bring beer to the gym next time instead of water. Sorry, but I can't express how idiotic that sounds in any sort of polite way.
Correlational research does not prove that one thing causes another. There always may be another factor out there called a "confounding variable" or "spurious correlation", which means that drinking & fitness can be completely unrelated. Something else is causing drinking & fitness levels to increase. There could be many reasons, but I think the confounding variable is: VANITY.
People who like to socially drink, probably also like to look GOOD right? Women who go to clubs dance it up anyway, but they also want to look hot in pictures don't they? So they exercise (and yes probably to burn off all the alcohol calories). But by no means would beer specifically enhance your performance magically nor is it the secret to being fit. My guess is that drinking and fitness are unrelated. They are just both affected by social and vanity reasons.
Another example: Research found that as ice cream sales went up, more people drowned at the beach. Does eating ice cream cause drowning? Or is there another factor or confounding variable? The only types of research that can imply cause and effect are efficacy trials and interventions.
In any website (not just Healthkicker) or any published research, there are always limitations. Research is never perfect. However, when you read newspaper articles or blogs, often they do not report these limitations to you! Or they may report one study's results, but not tell you that these results are quite contradictory with thousands of other study results. Healthkicker often publishes contradictory titles/topics to generate attention and controversy. This is UNETHICAL.
It is fine that normal people submit posts to Healthkicker to be published. But the editors of Healthkicker should at least be more knowledgeable of simple research methods and nutrition knowledge so that they can choose useful and beneficial articles for their site. When they choose to publish crap that just confuses the public like that... it makes people like me, who studies nutrition/health and wants to be a certified health professional, stray away from submitting real health posts to Healthkicker because I don't want to be associated with such an unprofessional and inaccurate site.
Post a Comment
- Back to theHealthRabbit's Xanga Site!
- Note: your comment will appear in theHealthRabbit's local time zone: GMT -05:00 (Eastern Standard - US, Canada)




Comments (30)
I agree. Great post.
Hmm interesting about Lovelyish thing. Perhaps it's just a coincidence they got something similar to what you have?
Oh the old "correlation = causation". Some people never learn.
The ish curse strikes again.
I think the lovelyish one might have just been a coincidence... there's no way they have access to things that aren't submitted to them.
http://xkcd.com/552/
I would put those posts private unless you are intending on people on your protected list to read them. Either that or write them up in Word or something then paste them in when the time comes.
Correlation being equal to causation seems to be the norm. If you look at the news, or any sort of political stuff that's all they do. If they can find any correlation they claim it as the cause of whatever it is they are for or against. They don't obey any standards of ethics or morality.
Everybody has to take advice with a grain of salt, do a little more research and get advice from a professional.
I think Shakespeare even said that alcohol doesn't improve performance but it does help in socializing.
I agree with you and rodeney123 ... I think Shakespeare said alcohol doesn't improve performance but it does help in socializing.
Xanga should drive the traffic to your site instead of an ish site. It would be better for them to have a health link they drove traffic to and your post could be on that health link and all the traffic goes to your site.
@TheTheologiansCafe - But Xanga needs to make money too right? I thought the Ish sites was where they made the most money. I also can't update as frequently as Healthkicker. But quality over quanitity right.
lovely post. you're points are true. : )
Good post :)
Great post. I'm subscibed to HealthKicker. I read that post and laughed.
I'M SUSCRIBED TO BOTH THE SITES AND ALSO YOURS BUT THOSE SITES LIKE LOVELYISH AND HEALTHKICKER I WAS IFFY ABOUT IT 'CUZ I WAS WONDERING WHERE THESE POSTS COME FROM! AND NO! ALCOHOL DOESN'T HELP YOU GET IN SHAPE! WTF! IF ANYTHING IT GIVES YOU MORE WEIGHT LIKE THE INFAMOUS "BEER BELLY" ANY STUPID PERSON KNOWS THAT!
Hmm interesting have not been on Xanga enough to witness this... editors should know the topic they post well. But I do agree with the incentives part. Xanga should offer something as a reward if they want to feature something. That is how they make money by using our blogs to gain traffic.
The more churches in a square mile, the more murder in that area! Don't go to church! Church makes you KILL PEOPLE!
Would you rather there be no Xanga, no Lovelyish, no healthkicker!? Even the NY Times releases health articles that conflict at times. for instance, drinking coffee versus not drinking coffee. There's a debate that's been around for a long time! And writers constantly shift their opinions about drinking coffee!!! So, I do not mind reading other people's OPINIONS on xanga, lovelyish, and healthkicker. I find many of the articles enjoyable and I use the "information" I read to develop my own opinions. I do not think it's unethical at all. Freedom of speech. You have the freedom to decide what you agree with and what you don't. I enjoy these sites, I value the information and ideas, and I hope they continue to be this way. Try not to take everything so literally, they're only one person's writings.
I think you're my hero.
Good heads up about the healthkicker + protected settings thingy! Loving the articles u're comin out with - keep it up!
Lol I'm in a science major too, so I get what you're saying about causation and how important it is... but I don't think the general public really understands the significance, or ever would without extensive training.
Same reasons why I don't read Healthkicker anymore either. I'm afraid if I took their advice, I might accidentally kill myself.
AMEN!
Let's hope I don't get this wrong. I've taken a number of research classes. I don't see anywhere in the alcohol/exercise post explicitly mentioning that one causes the other. It merely states that people that drink alcohol tend to exercise more. Other key words were also used like "prone", not cause. Prone can mean the relationship between alcohol and exercise. The original poster also mentions that this does not apply to everyone, again, taking out the "cause":
"It also said moderate or heavy-drinkers are prone to exercise
more vigorously than light-drinkers or teetotalers. But, this, of
course, doesn’t apply to EVERYONE, and it also doesn’t mean people like
me who don’t drink at all should start drinking from now on."
Also, in the yahoo article "vanity" variables were also mentioned , calorie intake (slimmer bodies), and other variables like sensation seeking was also mentioned.
Healthkicker is really just for entertaining purposes. But I do agree with you that some people may be misguided by bad information.
okies.
@timestill - I'm fine with the original yahoo article. The healthkicker one did take several quotes from the yahoo article, but then healthkicker input:
"Well, maybe I COULD try bringing beer to the gym instead of a bottle of water and see how that helps my overall performance" and ends with:
"Do you believe drinking helps you to be more active"
The way that healthkicker implies and interprets the information makes me worried about how readers may view this information. Not everyone is able to make reasonable opinions/conclusions through critical evaluation =(
Good stuff. I think there is a lack of professionalism towards the Nutritional discipline. Correct nutrient information is important for everyone.